Obama Asks EPA To Withdraw Draft Of Tougher Ozone Standard

Written by Keith Roberts on Sep. 03, 2011

President Obama bowed down to the demands of congressional Republicans and other business leaders on Friday when he announced that his administration’s plans to tighten smog rules had been scrapped. In a statement, the president said he wants the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to withdraw his administration’s draft plan for air quality standards for the ozone.

Obama asked EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to withdraw the draft of the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards plan, which he says is an effort to reduce regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty because of the struggling economy. He noted that it would impose a severe burden on industry and local governments and that it would cost billions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of jobs.

“Work is already under way to update a 2006 review of the science that will result in the reconsideration of the ozone standard in 2013,” he said in a statement. “Ultimately, I did not support asking state and local governments to begin implementing a new standard that will soon be reconsidered.”

Obama said that his administration would continue to protect the public health and environment. He noted that in the future he would “vigorously oppose efforts to weaken EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act or dismantle the progress we have made.”

Obama overruled both the EPA and the opinion of its panel of scientific advisers by withdrawing the proposed regulation, which would have reduced the amount of ground-level ozone from 75 parts per billion to a stricter 60 to 70 parts per billion.

According to the EPA, the new smog rule could have saved as much as $100 billion in health costs and could have prevented up to 12,000 premature deaths from heart and lung complications caused by ozone. Ozone is the main ingredient in smog, which is a lung irritant which can cause asthma and other respiratory conditions.

Shortly following the White House Statement, a spokesman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor celebrated the move. “GOP jobs pushing working,” Brad Dayspring said in a tweet.

However, many within Obama’s base were disappointed by the move, noting that he caved once again to demands by the Republican Party.

Gene Karpinski, the president of the League of Conservation Voters, also slammed the decision. “The Obama administration is caving to big polluters at the expense of protecting the air we breathe. This is a huge win for corporate polluters and huge loss for public health,” Karpinski told Forbes.

A statement by the Center for American Progress also slammed the decision made by the Obama administration.

“It is unfortunate that the Obama administration ceded on such an important standard for public health based on updated science recommendations ignored by the Bush administration,” part of the statement read. “The decision creates a clear blemish on an otherwise positive record of this administration in supporting initiatives that reduce pollution including the first fuel saving standards for trucks, higher fuel efficiency for cars built from 2017 to 2025 and proposed reductions in toxic pollution from coal-fired power plants. The president must continue to fight and defeat efforts to block and weaken other clean air health safeguards.”

Charles D. Connor, the President and CEO of the American Lung Association, was also not pleased by the decision made, noting that it is looking to revive its litigation to sue Obama’s administration, which they had previously suspended because of assurances that the administration was going to go forward with the regulation.

“For two years the Administration dragged its feet by delaying its decision, unnecessarily putting lives at risk. Its final decision not to enact a more protective ozone health standard is jeopardizing the health of millions of American, which is inexcusable,” a statement by Connor read.


  • Damonff

    He is starting to suck.

    • Quadhopper

      Do you miss George yet?

      • Icmishkit

        No.

      • Moira

        NEVER – he bankrupted us

    • sprinkboy

      Starting? This clown has sucked from day one. That’s why we needed Hillary. She would have gone in to the job and rammed single pay health care down the Republicans throat while Democrats still had control of the House and Senate.
      Obama must be a Republican deep plant.

  • Nomad6

    he got no balls:(

  • Nobama

    What do you mean by “Starting to suck”? he sucked from the beginning :D

  • RW&B

    “Jepardizing the health of millions of Americans”… with obamacare

  • Huntepr1billpay

    Jobs…. Jobs…. Jobs…. How about 0% tax on all jobs that have 100% american work force… all those cookie cutter jobs that the overseas factory workers do for cheap give it to our welfare folks. Then subsidize daycare for their kids…. All those IT jobs that have been loss because “we dont have the technical skills over here”… If you train us we will come….

    Healthcare should be tiered… Tiering where everyone gets the base healthcare, but then your job or you pay into a higher tier of healthcare if you opt to have better coverage.

    Hey I may not have all the answers, but hell I can come up with ideas just like the folks on the hill.

  • Roshwald Mordecai

    Mr. Obama makes a great contribution to the mortuary industry by lowering the pollution standards. A singular case of political wisdom: pereat mundus, fiat ‘Four more years in the white house!”

  • No-Balls-Barack strikes again. What happened to the Obama of 2008?

  • Roshwald Mordecai

    Mr. Obama is a true maverick: a U-turn from common sense to uncommon nonsense.

  • Rjt311

    Way to go obama. Jobs will always come first even at the expense of health. What a huge let down. Can’t wait to breathe even more polluted air. God forbid companies have to party money to comply with stricter regulations. Now people will have to pay more in health costs.